Effect of Accelerating Aging on Retention and the Release Period of Clips in a Bar Retained Maxillary Implant Overdenture


Bar attachment
Release Period


How to Cite

El Naggar D, Alam-Eldein AM, Halim MM, Rashad HMA. Effect of Accelerating Aging on Retention and the Release Period of Clips in a Bar Retained Maxillary Implant Overdenture. Integr J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Jan. 18 [cited 2024 Jun. 25];8. Available from: https://mbmj.org/index.php/ijms/article/view/385


Objectives: This study was made to detect the effect of accelerating aging on retention and measuring the release period of clips in a 2 and 3 bar retained maxillary implant overdenture. 
Materials and Methods: Four implants were placed in two maxillary edentulous epoxy models. One model had two bar attachments with two clips overdenture while the other model had three bar attachments with three clips in the overdenture. Retention and release period of the clips were checked before applying insertion removal cycles. Retention was measured using a universal testing machine after 540 cycles (6 months) and 1080 cycles (1 year) of insertion removal on a chewing simulator.
Results and Conclusions: There was a significant difference in retention and release period between two bars and three bars implant retained maxillary overdentures. A significant difference was also seen in each group after accelerated aging. Therefore, the three bar implant retained overdenture had higher retention values than two bar. Retention loss occurred in both groups after the insertion removal cycles. Release period value was lower in two bar overdenture than three bar overdenture.



Laurito D, Lamazza L, Spink M, de biase A. Tissue-supported dental implant prosthesis (overdenture): the search for the ideal protocol. A literature review. Ann Stomatol (Roma).2012 Jan;3(1):2-10.

Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Jan;37(1):98-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.2009.01493.x

El-Anwar M, Ghali R, Aboelnagga M. 3D Finite Element Study on: Bar Splinted Implants Supporting Partial Denture in the Reconstructed Mandible. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2016;4:164-171. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2016.027

Heydecke G, McFarland DH, Feine JS, Lund JP. Speech with maxillary implant prostheses: ratings of articulation. J Dent Res. 2004 Mar;83(3):236-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300310

Heydecke G, Boudrias P, Awad MA, De Albuquerque RF, Lund JP, Feine JS. Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Feb;14(1):125-30. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140117.x

Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:108-25. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1108.x

Doundoulakis JH, Eckert SE, Lindquist CC, Jeffcoat MK. The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. J Am Dent Assoc.2003;134(11):1455-8. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0073

Chee W, Jivraj S. Treatment planning of the edentulous mandible. Br Dent J. 2006;201(6):337-47. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4814041

Suzuki Y, Osada H, Kobayashi M, Katoh M, Kokubo Y, Sato J, et al. Long-term clinical evaluation of implant over denture. J Prosthodont Res. 2012;56(1):32-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2011.05.002

Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Schmitt S. The effect of simulated function on the retention of bar-clip retained removable prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75(5):570-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90465-5

Petropoulos VC, Smith W, Kousvelari E. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12(2):176-85.

Savabi O, Nejatidanesh F, Yordshahian F. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39(2):140-7.

Williams BH, Ochiai KT, Hojo S, Nishimura R, Caputo AA. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:603-607. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00016

Uludag B, Polat S. Retention characteristics of different attachment systems of mandibular overdentures retained by two or three implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(6):1509-13.

Lehmann. K.M, Arnim FV. Studies on the retention forces of snap-on attachments SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd. 1976;86(5):521-30.[16]Chung KH, Chung CY, Cagna DR, Cronin Jr RJ. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures J Prosthodont. 2004 Dec;13(4):221-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04042.x

Van Kampen F, Cune M, Van Der Bilt A, Bosman F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar‐clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Dec;14(6):720-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00961.x

Botega D, Mesquita M, Henriques G, Vaz LG. Retention force and fatigue strength of overdenture attachment systems. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Sep;31(9):884-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01308.x

Walton JN, Ruse ND. In vitro changes in clips and bars used to retain implant overdentures. J Prosthet Dent.1995 Nov;74(5):482-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80349-x

Bayer S, Komor N, Kramer A, Albrecht D, Mericske-Stern R, Enkling N. Retention force of plastic clips on implant bars: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Dec;23(12):1377-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02312.x

El Syad M, Mahmoud A. Dayekh , Khalifa AK. Locator versus bar attachment effect on the retention of implant support maxillary overdenture: An invitro study. J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e627-e636. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12608

Hammas M, El-Saadawy M, El-Agamy A. Effect of Different Bar Attachment and Clip Materials on Retention Force for Mandibular Implant Supported Overdentures. Al-Azhar Dent J Girls. 2018; 5(2):195-204. https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2018.9531

Setz J, Lee SH, Engel E. Retention of prefabricated attachments for implant stabilized overdentures in the edentulous mandible: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Sep;80(3):323-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70133-7

Gamborena JI, Hazelton LR, NaBadalung D, Brudvik J. Retention of ERA direct overdenture attachments before and after fatigue loading. Int J Prosthodont. Mar-Apr 1997;10(2):123-30.

Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998 Jun;9(3):170-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090304.x

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 El Naggar D et al.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...