The biological and Mechanical Behavior of the Standard Implant under Removable Partial Dentures: Systematic Review


Dental implant
Removable partiel denture
Implant survival rate
Implant disease
Pressure distribution
Stress distribution
Bone resorption


How to Cite

Kadri G, Bahije L, Berrada S. The biological and Mechanical Behavior of the Standard Implant under Removable Partial Dentures: Systematic Review: . Integr J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 1 [cited 2024 Jun. 25];8. Available from:


Background: The implant-supported removable partial denture appears to be an interesting alternative for cases where the implant-supported fixed prosthesis is contraindicated whether it is for medical, local, or financial reasons. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the biological and mechanical behavior of the implant under a removable partial denture.
Methods: A literature search was conducted on the following databases: Pubmed [Medline], Science Direct, and Cochrane Library. The research was limited to publications in English and French during the period from 01/1/2007 to 27/03/2020.
Results: Of the 334 citations initially identified, 22 articles met our inclusion criteria, assessing the implant survival rate, patient satisfaction, and the occurrence of implant and prosthetic complications. As well as the evaluation of the stress distribution on the three support surfaces of this prosthesis. Finally, the evaluation of implant localization. The results showed a high rate of implant survival and the occurrence of some prosthetic complications. Stable and acceptable bone resorption over the long term. Better stress distribution at the implant and the bone.
Conclusion: The biological and mechanical behavior of the implant under this type of prosthesis appears to be viable in the short, medium, and long term. Although this association between implantology and partial prosthesis seems promising, additional studies are needed to spread this practice still reserved for some specific cases.


Iraqui O, Berrada S, Merzouk N, Abdedine A. Rôle de la maintenance dans la pérennité des restaurations prothétiques Illustré par un cas clinique. WJD. 2006;1. Available from:

Le bars P, Amouriq Y, Bodic F, Giumelli B. Réactions tissulaires au port des appareils de prothèses dentaire amovible partielle ou totale. EMC. 2002; 23(325):p-10. AAvailable from:,des%20d%C3%A9sordres%20temporomandibulaires%20peuvent%20appara%C3%AEtre

Borel JC, Schittly J, Exbrayat J. Manuel de prothèse partielle amovible. Paris: Masson; 1994.

Wagner.B, Kern.M. Clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures 10 years after insertion success rates, hygienic problems, and technical failures. Clin Oral Invest. 2000 ; 4(2) :74-80.

Lavinge J, Pierre P. Implantologie et prothèse amovible. Les cahiers de prothèse n°94 ; 1996.

Begin M. 1990-2010 : Quelles évolutions en prothèse amovible partielle et complète? Réalités Cliniques. 2010; 21(2):99-110.

Taddei C, WaltmannE. Implantset prothèse partielle amovible. France: Quintessence International; 2010.

Fouilloux I, Begin M. Implantologie et prothèse amovible partielle. L’Information Dentaire. 2012; 94(32):89-98.

Belia E, Audenino G, Ceruti P, Basso F. Clinical assaessment of short implants retaining removable partial dentures: 4-years follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Jan/Feb 2020;35(1):207-213.

Threeburuth W, Aunmeungtong W, Khongkhunthian P. Comparison of immediate-load mini dental implants and conventional-size dental implants to retain mandibular Kennedy class I removable partial dentures: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20(5):785-792.

Bae EB, Kim SJ, ChoiJW, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Yun MJ, et al. A Clinical Retrospective Study of Distal Extension Removable Partial Denture with Implant Surveyed Bridge or Stud Type Attachment. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7140870.

Jensen C, Speksnijder C, Raghoebar G, Kerdijk W, Meijer HJA, Cune MS. Implant-supported mandibular removable partial dentures: Functional, clinical and radiographical parameters in relation to implant position. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2017 Jun;19(3):432-439.

Jensen C, Meijer H, Raghoebar G, Kerdijk W, Cune MS. Implant-supported removable partial dentures in the mandible: A 3–16 year retrospective study. J prosthod res. 2017; 61(2):98-105.

Mijiritsky E, Lorean A, Mazor Z, Levin L. Implant Tooth-Supported Removable Partial Denture with at Least 15-Year Long-Term Follow-Up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17(5):917-22.

Noda K, Arakawa H, Kimura-Ono A, Yamazaki S, Hara ES, Sonoyama W. A longitudinal retrospective study of the analysis of the risk factors of implant failure by the application of generalized estimating equations. J Prosthodont Res.2015 Jul;59(3):178-84.

Gonçalves TM, Campos CH, Garcia RC. Implant retention and support for distal extension partial removable dental prostheses: satisfaction outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112(2):334-9.

Gholami H, Mericske-Stern R, Kessler-Liechti G, Katsoulis J. Radiographic Bone Level Changes of Implant Supported Restorations in Edentulous and Partially Dentate Patients: 5-Year Results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Jul-Aug 2014;29(4):898-904.

Bortolini S, Natali A, Franchi M Consollo U.Implant-retained removable partial dentures: an 8 year retrospective study. J Prosthodont 2011 ; 20(3) :168-172

Suzuki Y, Osada H, Kobayashi M, Katoh M, Kokubo Y, Sato J, et al. Long-term clinical evaluation of implant over denture. J Prosthod Res. 2011 Jan; 56(1):32-6.

Grossmann Y, Nissan J, Levin L. Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported removable partial dentures: a review of the literature and retrospectivecase evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67(9):1941-6.

Kaufmann R, Friedli M, Hug S, Mericske-Stern R. Removable Dentures with Implant Support in Strategic Positions Followed for Up to 8 Years. Int J Prosthodont. May-Jun 2009;22(3):233-41; discussion 242.

Grossmann Y, Levin L, Sadan A. A retrospective case series of implants used to restore partially edentulous patients with implant-supported removable partial dentures: 31-month mean follow-up results. Quintessence Int. 2008 Sep;39(8):665-71.

Tandlich M, Ekstein J, Reisman P, Shapira L. Removable Prostheses May Enhance Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants: A Long-Term Retrospective Analysis. J Periodontol. 2007; 78(12):2253-9.

Ortiz-Puigpelat O, Lazaro-Abdulkarim A, de Medrano-Reñé JM, Gargallo-Albiol J, Cabratosa-Termes J, Hernández-Alfaro F. Influence of Implant Position in Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e675-e681.

Matsudate Y, Yoda N, Nanba M, Ogawa T, Sasaki K. Load distribution on abutment tooth, implant and residual ridge with distal-extension implantsupported removable partial denture. J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Oct;60(4):282-288.

Kono K, Kurihara D, Suzuki Y, Ohkubo C. Pressure distribution of implant supported removable partial dentures with stress-breaking attachments. J ProsthodontRes.2014 Apr;58(2):115-20.

Memari Y, Ger A, Fayaz A. Influence of Implant Position on Stress Distribution inImplant-Assisted Distal Extension Removable Partial Dentures: A 3D FiniteElementAnalysis. J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Sep;11(5):523-30. Epub 2014 Sep 30. Available From:

Sato M, Suzuki Y, Kurihara D, Shimpo H, Ohkubo C. Effect of implant support on mandibular distal extension removable partial dentures: Relationship between denture supporting area and stress distribution. J Prosthodont Res. 2013 Apr;57(2):109-12.

Rodrigues RC, Faria AC, Macedo AP, De Mattos Mda G, Ribeiro RF. Retention and stress distribution in distal extension removable partial dentures with and without implant association. J ProsthodontRes.2013 Jan;57(1):24-9.

Cunha LD, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, Pereira JA. Evaluation of the Influence of Location of Osseointegrated Implants Associated with Mandibular Removable Partial Dentures. Implant Dent. 2008 Sep;17(3):278-87.

Da Silva M, Consani R, Oliveira G. Association between implants and removable partial dentures: review of the literature. RSBO. 2011;8(1):88-92.

De Freitas RF, de Carvalho Dias K, da Fonte Porto, Carreiro A, GAS Barbosa, MAF Ferreira. Mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Oct;39(10):791-8.

PellizzerEP,Rocha EP, Pereira JA. Influence of length and diameter of implantsassociated with distal extension removable partial dentures. Implant Dent. 2007 Sep;16(3):270-80.

Giffin KM. Solving the distal extension removable partial denturebase movement dilemma: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76(4):347-9.

Bidra AS, Daubert DM, Garcia LT, Kosinski TF, NennCA, Olsen JA. Clinical practice guidelines for recall and maintenance of patients with tooth-borne and implant-borne dental restorations. J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan;25 Suppl 1:S32-40.

Brudvik JS. Advanced removable partial dentures. Chicago: Quintessence-Books;1999. Available from:

Mijiritsky E, Ormianer Z, Klinger A, Mardinger O. Use of dental implants to improve unfavorable removable partial denture design. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005 Oct;26(10):744-6, 748, 750 passim.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Kadri G et al.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...