Anthropological Approach of the Proximal Tooth Area: A Systematic Review


Tooth wear
Dental anatomy
Proximal Contact
Systematic Review
Based Medicin


How to Cite

Yosra T, El Haddaoui R, Bahoum A, Zaoui F. Anthropological Approach of the Proximal Tooth Area: A Systematic Review. Integr J Med Sci [Internet]. 2020 Sep. 23 [cited 2024 Apr. 17];7. Available from:


An analysis of dental anthropological literature dealing with the dental wear of prehistoric men, reveals that little information about interproximal dental attrition and its evolution with the modern man is available. This observation marked anthropologists and dentists for a long. The objective of this review is to determine the origin of the interproximal contact region of the tooth. In other words, which interproximal contact was first to appear in human dentitions? Is it the interproximal contact point or the contact surface?
An electronic search was performed in four databases: PUBMED, SCOPUS, Cochrane Database, and EBSCO. Our search was limited to articles in English. We included in our research dental and anthropological studies concerning Homo sapiens and excluded all the other species such as Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus, Homo Rhudolfensis, and Homo Neandertalensis. Attritional occlusion and flattened proximal facets are considered some of the main characteristics of the masticatory system of nonindustrialized men. Theories and dental researches tried to explain the proliferation of malocclusion and severe tooth crowding in modern society.
The study of dental wear is a path of research that highlights the evolution of the manducatory system and thus, it influences the choice of treatment in our practices.


Sluder TB. Clinical dental anatomy, histology, physiology, and occlusion. In: The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry (ed. CM. Studevant), 2nd edn, 1985p. 20. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Picton DC. Tilting movements of teeth during biting. Arch Oral Biol. Mar-Apr 1962; 7:151–159.

Begg PR, Kesling PC. Begg orthodontic theory and technique, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1977.

Wolpoff MH. Interstitial wear. Am J PhysAntrhopol. 1971 Mar; 34(2): 205-27.

Begg PR. Stone age man’s dentition: With reference to anatomically correct occlusion, the etiology of malocclusion, and a technique for its treatment. Am J Orthod. 1954; 40(7): 517-531.

Kaifu Y. Changes in the pattern of tooth wear from prehistoric to recent periods in Japan. Am J Phys Anthrop. 1999 Aug; 109(4):485-499.;2-k

Molnar S, Barrett MJ, Brian L, Brace LC, Brose DV, Dewey JR, et al. Tooth wear and culture: a survey of tooth functions among some prehistoric populations. Curr Anthropol. 1972; 13(5):511–526.

Brace CL. Occlusion to the anthropological eye. In: McNamara JA Jr (ed) The biology of occlusal development. Monograph no. 7, Craniofacial Growth Series. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 1977; 179–209.

Hinton RJ. Differences in interproximal and occlusal tooth wear among prehistoric tennessee Indians: Implications for Masticatory Function. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1982 Jan; 57(1):103-15.

Neiburger EJ. The evolution of human occlusion-Ancient clinical tips for modern dentists. Gen Dent. Jan-Feb 2002; 50(1):44-9.

Kaifu Y, Kasai K, Townsend GC, Richards LC. Tooth wear and the "design" of the human dentition: a perspective from evolutionary medicine. Am J PhysAnthropol. 2003; Suppl 37:47-61.

Rose JC, Roblee RD. Origins of dental crowding and malocclusions: an anthropological perspective. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2009 Jun; 30(5):292-300.

Kaidonis JA, Ranjitkar S, Lekkas D, Brook AH, Townsend GC. Functional dental occlusion: an anthropological perspective and implications for practice. Aust Dent J. 2014 Jun; 59 Suppl. 1:162-73.

Sarig R. and coll. How did the Qesem Cave people use their teeth? Analysis of dental wear patterns. Quatemary International. 2016; 398:136-147.

Sarig R, Lianopoulos NV, Hershkovitz I, Vardimon AD. The arrangement of the interproximal interfaces in the human permanent dentition. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr; 17(3): 731-8.

Picton DC. Some implications of normal tooth mobility during mastication. Arch. Oral Biol. Sep-Oct 1964; 9: 565-573.

Benazzi S, Fiorenza L, Katina S, Bruner E, Kullmer O. Quantitative assessment of interproximal wear facet outlines for the association of isolated molars. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011 Feb; 144(2):309-316.

Estalrrich A, Rosas A, García-Vargas S, García-Tabernero A, Santamaría D, de la Rasilla M. Brief communication: subvertical grooves on interproximal wear facets from the El Sidron (Asturias, Spain) Neandertal dental sample. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011 Jan; 144(1):154–161.

Wolpoff MH, Smith M, Malez M, Radovčićal J, Rukavina D. Upper Pleistocene human remains from Vindija Cave, Croatia, Yugoslavia. Am Physical Anthropol. 1981 54:499-545.

Kaidonis JA, Ranjitkar S, Lekkas D, Townsend GC. An anthropological perspective: another dimension to modern dental wear concepts. Int J Dent. 2012; 2012: 741405.

Begg P. Progress report on observations on attrition of the teeth in its relation to pyorrhea and tooth decay. Aust J Dent. 1938; 42:315-20.

Mossey PA. The heritability of malocclusion: Part 1--Genetics, principles and terminology. Br J Orthod. 1999 Jun; 26(2):103-113.

Corruccini RS. Anthropological aspects of orofacial and occlusal variations and anomalies. In: Kelley MA. Larson CS, eds. Advances in Dental Anthropology. New York, NY: Wiky-Liss Inc. 1991; 295-32.3.

Danesh G, Hellak A, Lippold C, Ziebura T, Schafer E. Enamel surfaces following interproximal reduction with different methods. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77:1004–1010.

Burrows T. Anno Domini: the Origins of the Christian Era (review). Parergon. 2005; 22(1):219-221.

Taylor T. Prehistory vs. Archaeology: Terms of Engagement. J World Prehistory. 2008;21(1):1–18.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Tabchi Y et al.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...