Digital Models and Orthodontic Diagnosis: What Degree of Reliability?
PDF

Keywords

Orthodontics
Cone-beam computed tomography
Digital models
Plaster models
Accuracy

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Rabe AH, Salek F, El Idrissi I, Zaoui F, Benyahia H. Digital Models and Orthodontic Diagnosis: What Degree of Reliability?. Integr J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Jan. 18 [cited 2024 Jun. 15];8. Available from: https://mbmj.org/index.php/ijms/article/view/384

Abstract

Background: Our study aims to evaluate, through a systematic review, the reliability of numerical models compared to conventional models on the main parameters of orthodontic diagnosis 
Method: four databases were consulted: PubMed; Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Ebscohost. The research included published studies since 2010, meta-analysis studies, randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective studies.
Results: Among 3811 selected references, only five studies met our inclusion criteria. In the systematic review, there were statistical differences between the digital models and the plaster models. However, this difference is clinically acceptable. On the other hand, there are some limitations, relative to the types of the severity of the congestion, the elapsed time to digitize, and the numerical means.
Conclusion: The results of our systematic review have shown that there is no clinically significant difference between the numerical and physical models for the majority of diagnostic parameters.

https://doi.org/10.15342/ijms.2021.384
PDF

References

Duvert R, Gebeile-Chauty S. La précision des empreintes numériques intra-orales en orthodontie est-elle suffisante ? Orthod Fr. 2017;88(4):347–354. https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/2017024

Peluso MJ, Josell SD, Levine SW, Lorei BJ. Digital models: An introduction. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2004;10(3):226–38. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2004.05.007

Lippold C, Kirschneck C, Schreiber K, Abukiress S, Tahvildari A, Moiseenko T. Methodological Accuracy of Digital and Manual Model Analysis in Orthodontics -A Retrospective Clinical Study. Comp Bio Med. 2015;62:103-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.04.012

Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud WD, Heo G, Major WP. Validity, Reliability, and Reproducibility of Plaster vs Digital Study Models: Comparison of Peer Assessment Rating And Bolton Analysis and Their Constituent Measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(6):794-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023q

Rebong RE, Stewart KT, Utreja A, Ghoneima AA. Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin modelscreated by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A Comparative Study. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(3):363-369. https://doi.org/10.2319/071117-460.1

San José V, Bellot-Arcís C, Tarazona B, Zamora N, O Lagravère M, Paredes-Gallardo V. Dental Measurements and Bolton Index Reliability and Accuracy Obtained from 2d Digital, 3d Segmented CBCT, and 3d Intraoral Laser Scanner. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Dec 1;9(12):e1466-e1473. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.54428

Brown GB, Currier GF, Kadioglu O, Kierl JP. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154(5):733-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.009

Reuschl RP, Heuer W, Stiesch M, Wenzel D, Dittmer MP. Reliability And Validity Of Measurements on Digital Study Models and Plaster Models. Europ J Orthod. 2016; 38(1):22–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv001

Liang YM, Rutchakitprakarn L, Kuang SH, Wu TY. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity. J Chinese Med Assoc. 2018;81(9):842-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2017.11.011

Tavares A, Braga E, Araújo TM. Digital models: How Can Dental Arch Form Be Verified Chairside? Dental Press J Orthod. 2017; 22(6):68-73. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.6.068-073.oar

Cesur MG, Omurlu IK, Ozer T. Evaluation of Digital Model Accuracy and Time-Dependent Deformation of Alginate Impressions. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20(9):1175-1181. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.197012

Kim J, Heo G, Lagravère MO. Accuracy of Laser-Scanned Models Compared to Plaster Models and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Angle Orthod. 2014 May;84(3):443-50. https://doi.org/10.2319/051213-365.1

Ferreira JB, Christovam IO, Alencar DS, da Motta AFJ, Mattos CT, Cury-Saramago A. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Dental Measurements on Tomographic Digital Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Oct;46(7):20160455. https://doi.org/10.2319/051213-365.1

Darroudi AM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Ongkosuwito EM, Suttorp CM, Bronkhorst EM, Breuning KH. Accuracy of a Computed Tomography Scanning Procedure to Manufacture Digital Models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 May;151(5):995-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.013

Vogel AB, Kilic F, Schmidt F, Rübel S, Lapatki BG. Dimensional Accuracy of Jaw Scans Performed on Alginate Impressions or Stone Models: A practice-oriented study. J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Jul;76(4):351-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-015-0296-2

Kim J, Lagravere. Accuracy of Bolton Analysis Measured in Laser Scanned Digital Models Compared with Plaster Models (gold standard) and Cone-Beam Computer Tomography Images. Korean J Orthod. 2016;46(1):13-19. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.13

Bernabé E, Villanueva KM, Flores-Mir C. Tooth Width Ratios in Crowded and Noncrowded Dentitions. Angle Orthod. 2004 Dec;74(6):765-8. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074%3C0765:twrica%3E2.0.co;2

Shellhart WC, Lange DW, Kluemper GT, Hicks EP, Kaplan AL. Reliability of the Bolton Tooth-Size Analysis When Applied to Crowded Dentitions. Angle Orthod 1995;65:327e34. https://doi.org/10.1043/00033219(1995)065<0327:ROTBTA>2.0.CO;2

Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of Measurements Made on Digital and Plaster Models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 July;124(1):101-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00152-5

Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A Comparison of Plaster, Digital and Reconstructed Study Model Accuracy. J Orthod. 2008 Sept;35(3):191-201. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225022626

Coleman RM, Hembree JH Jr, Weber FN. Dimensional Stability of Irreversible Hydrocolloid Impression Material. Am J Orthod 1979;75:438-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(79)90166-0

Alcan T, Ceylanoglu C, Baysal B. The Relationship Between Digital Model Accuracy and Time-Dependent Deformation of Alginate Impressions. Angle Orthod 2009;79:30-6. https://doi.org/10.2319/100307-475.1

Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, Reliability, And Reproducibility Of Plaster Vs Digital Study Models: Comparison of Peer Assessment Rating and Bolton Analysis and Their Constituent Measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129: 794e803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023

Czarnota J, Hey J, Fuhrmann R. Measurements Using Orthodontic Analysis Software bn Digital Models Obtained By 3d Scans of Plaster Casts: Intrarater Reliability And Validity. J Orofac Orthop 2016;77:22e30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-015-0004-2

Grunheid T, Patel N, De Felippe NL, Wey A, Gaillard PR, Larson BE. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 145: 157–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-015-0004-2

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Rabe AH et al.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...