Removable Partial Denture Design in Dental Practice: Epidemiological Study in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra Region (Part 1)
PDF

Keywords

Removable partial denture design
Partial edentulous

Categories

How to Cite

1.
ELQARFAOUI A, LAOUFI MN, MERZOUK N, REGRAGUI A. Removable Partial Denture Design in Dental Practice: Epidemiological Study in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra Region (Part 1). Integr J Med Sci [Internet]. 2022 Feb. 25 [cited 2022 Nov. 30];9. Available from: https://mbmj.org/index.php/ijms/article/view/629

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the enrichment of our therapeutic panoply by integrating implants and CAD/CAM techniques, the removable partial denture (RPD) with metallic infrastructure (RPD) will remain an unavoidable alternative in the rehabilitation of partial edentulous teeth. The purpose of this survey, divided into three parts, is to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of dentists in private practice in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region regarding the design of RPDs, to provide information on the means of communication with laboratory technicians, and investigate possible correlations between the failure of the prosthetic project and certain adopted practices.
Materials and Methods: The study had a sample of 101 dentists practicing in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitrato region to whom we sent an anonymous 4-page printed questionnaire containing 28 questions on the design of metal frames in PAPM. A descriptive and analytical statistical study was conducted to process the data.
Results: Following the results of the statistical study, only 8% of the practitioners performed more than ten partial removable prostheses per month, 17% did not perform a clinical examination, 20% did not perform a study model, and 69% did not perform the RPD design by themselves and entrusted this task to the dental technician. In comparison, 89% did not use a Dental Surveyor.
Conclusion: This survey showed that many practitioners do not follow the rules of good practice and lack knowledge of the RPD design. Therefore, postgraduate training is envisaged to help practitioners implement these good practices and improve this knowledge. However, it was noted that only 58% of the practitioners in our sample were interested in such training.

https://doi.org/10.15342/ijms.2022.629
PDF

References

Santoni P. Maîtriser la prothèse amovible partielle. cdp Groupe Liaisons: Paris ;2004.

Normand B. Conception et tracé des prothèses amovibles partielles. Prostho ; Canada : 1996.

Kilfeather GP, Lynch CD, Sloan AJ, Youngson CC. Quality of communication and master impressions for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in general dental practice in England, Ireland and Wales in 2009. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(4):300–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02055.x

Vanzeveren C, D’Hoore W, Bercy P, Leloup G. Treatment with removable partial dentures: a longitudinal study. Part I. J Oral Rehabil. 2003; 30(5):447-58. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01106.x

L’Alzit FR, Jacob F. Recueil des données : une étape clé dans la réussite du traitement par prothèse amovible partielle à châssis métallique. Info Dent. 2019. [Accessed 2022 Feb 17]. Available from: https://www.information-dentaire.fr/formations/recueil-des-donnees-une-etape-cle-dans-la-reussite-du-traitement-par-prothese-amovible-partielle-a-chassis-metallique/

Soenen A. L’apport de la CFAO en prothèse amovible partielle à châssis métallique. L’Information Dentaire. 2019. [Accessed 2022 Feb 17]. Available from: https://www.information-dentaire.fr/formations/l-apport-de-la-cfao-en-prothese-amovible-partielle-a-chassis-metallique/

Gala J. Conception Des Châssis En Prothese Partielle Adjointe : Le Point De Vue Des Chirurgiens-Dentistes Et Des Prothesistes. 2013.

Bidet F. Les empreintes en prothèse partielle coulée : le point de vue des chirurgiens-dentistes et des prothésistes. undefined. 2016.

Badji K, Gueye M, Fall Fa, Kamara Pi, Touré A, Thioune N, et al. Conception De Prothèse Amovible Partielle À Châssis Métallique : Analyse De L’implication Des Prothésistes. Rev Col Odonto-Stomatol Afr Chir Maxillo-fac. 2020;27(1):23–26. [Accessed 2022 Feb 18]. Available from: http://revues-ufhb ci.org/fichiers/FICHIR_ARTICLE_2983.pdf

Haj-Ali R, Al Quran F, Adel O. Dental Laboratory Communication Regarding Removable Dental Prosthesis Design in the UAE: RDP Design. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21(5):425-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2011.00842.x

Bartlett D, Preiskel A, Shah P, Ahmed A, Moazzez R. An audit of prosthodontics undertaken in general dental practice in the South East of England. Br Dent J. 2009; 207(8):E15–E15. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.908

Polychronakis N, Sotiriou M, Zissis A. A Survey of Removable Partial Denture (RPD) Retentive Elements in Relation to the Type of Edentulism and Abutment Teeth Found in Commercial Laboratories, Athens, Greece. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2014; 48(3):199–207. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc48/3/4

Nassani MZ, Devlin H, Tarakji B, McCORD JF. Designing cobalt chromium removable partial dentures for patients with shortened dental arches - a pilot survey. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38(8):608-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02190.x

Kimura M. [A Clinical Evaluation of Masticatory Function in Maxillary Bilateral Free-End-Saddle Removable Partial Denture in Changes of Mucosal Support Area]. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1999 Dec;66(4):382-96.https://doi.org/10.5357/koubyou.66.382

Lynch CD, Allen PF. A survey of chrome-cobalt RPD design in Ireland. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16(4):362–364.

McCracken WL, Brown DT, McCracken WL. McCracken’s removable partial prosthodontics. 12th ed. 2011. St. Louis, Mo. Elsevier Mosby.

Basker RM, Harrison A, Davenport JC, Marshall JL. Partial denture design in general dental practice--10 years on. Br Dent J. 1988;165(7):245–249. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4806577

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Amina ELQARFAOUI, Mohamed Nidal LAOUFI, Nadia MERZOUK, Anissa REGRAGUI

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.